Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS Trade Practices - application for damages - interlocutory application for order to prevent dissipation of assets by
respondent.
Injunction - power of Court to order Mareva type injunction - implied power - Order for payment or giving of security to Court in sum of $3 million - whether court should have made such an interlocutory order - privilege against self incrimination -
failure of court to obtain an undertaking as to damages.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 33.23 and 32 Trade Practices Act 1974 ss.80 and 87
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE RAL CO EF AUSTRALIA
~ JOHN WILLIAM JACKSON v STERLING INDUSTRIES LIMITED
NO. G 194 of 1986
BOWEN C.J., WOODWARD & JACKSON JJ. SYDNEY iS OCTOBER 1986
IN THE FEDERAL COURT ) OF AUSTRALIA ) NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY )
)
GENERAL DIVISION
No. G 194 of 1986
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ;
BETWEEN:
JOHN WILLIAM JACKSON Appellant
AND
STERLING INDUSTRIES LIMITED (Receivers and Managers Appointed)
Respondent CORAM: Bowen C.J., Woodward and Jackson JJ. DATE: \S October, 1986. PLACE: Sydney MINUTE OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to amend the notice of
appeal be refused. 2. The appeal be dismissed. 3. John William Jackson pay to Sterling Industries
Limited its costs of the appeal.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
ee ee en nT es
at. «
IN THE FEDERAL COURT ) OF AUSTRALIA ) No. G 194 of 1986 NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY ) GENERAL DIVISION )
QN APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: JOHN WILLT. JACKSON a" Appellant
AND
LING fT IES LIMITED (Receivers and Managers Appointed)
Respondent COURT: Bowen C.J., Woodward and Jackson JJ. ' DATE: 15 October, 1986. PLACE: Sydney REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BOWEN C.J.
This is an appeal against interlocutory orders made on 23 April 1986 in proceedings brought by Sterling Industries Limited ("Sterling") against John William Jackson and other parties. Mr Jackson on 2 May 1986 obtained leave to appeal. The course of proceedings and a reference to the facts are set forth in the reasons for judgment of Woodward J. I shall not repeat
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate