Federal Court of Australia
ry
Hy
CATCHWORDS Bankruptcy - deed of arrangement entered into consequent upon resolution passed at meeting of creditors - proxies qiven to chairman of meeting and Controlling Trustee - Trustee holding
onlv one proxv purporting to appoint another person chairman of
meeting - whether appointment of chairman valid.
Bankruptcy Act 19646, s. 196
RE_PAUL SHERGOLD & JUDY SHERGOLD,. EX PARTE THOMAS GERALD McINNES
& PAULINE MARIA McINNES
Nos. P321 of 1986 and W1105 of 1986
Coram: Sheppard J.
Date : 16 October 1986
Place: Svdnev
Note: This jiudament should be read in coniunction with the
judament of Sheppard J. in Re Sheraold and Anor; ex parte McInnes
and Anor (No. P321 of 1986) delivered on 3 September 1986.
IN_THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT
OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
a) i) ) ) ) Nos. P321 of 1986 ) and W1105 of 1986 ) ) ) ) )
RE PAUL SHERGOLD & JUDY SHERGOLD EX_PARTE: THOMAS GERALD McINNES & PAULINE MARIA McINNES MINUTES OF ORDER JUDGE MAKING ORDER: Sheppard J. DATE OF ORDER : 16 October 198A
WHERE MADE : Svdney
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The application to rescind the order made on 3 September 1986 be
dismissed.
NOTE:
Settlement and entrv of orde
of the Bankruptcy Rules.
rs is dealt with in Rule 124
IN_THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALTA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION
Nos. P321 of 1986
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT and W1105 of 1986
OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
www er eryewwrvervrn
AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
RE: PAUL SHERGOLD & JUDY SHERGOLD
EX PARTE: THOMAS GERALD McINNES & PAULINE MARTA McINNES
CORAM: SHEPPARD J.
DATE : 16 OCTOBER 1986
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR: This is an application to rescind an order made bv me on 3 September last. The order was that the Deed of Arrangement entered into by the debtors on 30 Mav 1986 be set aside. Reqrettabliv. due to the smallness of the estate of the debtors. I did not have the assistance of evidence from the debtors nor the trustee, who had been appointed trustee in the Deed of Arrangement. In the result. the facts that I had from the judament creditors. and upon which I relied. were not completely accurate. This was not the fault of the iudament creditors nor their leqal advisers. It was due to the absence from the proceedings before me of the iudament debtors and the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate