Federal Court of Australia
ty
AAS
. NOT CONSIDERED SUITABLE FOR CIRCULATION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY No. 470 of 1986
www ws
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
SEBASTIAN HAMLET LAREMONT
Applicant
MINISTER FOR
IMMIGRATION & ETHNIC AFFAIRS
Respondent
EX-TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BURCHETT J.
In this matter the applicant entered Australia on 30 April 1980 and was granted a temporary entry permit for a period of two months. Since then he has been here as what is now, under the legislation currently in force, described as a prohibited
non~citizen.
On 17 July 1985 a deportation order was made. On 16 August 1985 a review of that order was sought through the Court, and on 12 September 1985 an application was made that he be found to be entitled to refugee status. The RE ie of refugee status on 30 September 19855 ecomitended against his
7, » \2
being found to have that status. ~ Ps) « +t 1 7 NOV19R5
FEDERAL COURT OF
AUSTRALIA PRINCI REGISTAY
3"
ra
On 27 October 1985 the deportation order made in July was revoked. The question of the issue of a temporary entry permit, at that stage, was considered, and it was decided that it should be refused, and a further deportation order was made. On 6 December 1985 Lockhart J. ordered that the matter be referred back for further consideration, for reasons which were substantially concerned with a failure, which his Honour found had occurred, to take account of a relevant consideration. That relevant consideration related to the applicant's need to be in Australia, in the then near future, for the purposes of a workers compensation claim which he had made. Lockhart J. ruled that this consideration had not been properly put to the Minister, and that what had happened in connection with it amounted to a
failure to take it into account in an appropriate way.
The workers compensation proceedings were concluded in December 1985, but they led to further proceedings in the District Court in February of this year, and the enforcement of deportation was delayed for reasons, at any rate which included, permitting finalisation of the District Court proceedings which
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate