Mackay, Re O.M. Ex Parte The Bankrupt [1986] FCA 527
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
CATCHWORODS
BANKRUPTCY - application for discharge - whether cogent ground need
be shown - attachment of condition to order.
Bankruptcy Act, 1966 s.150
Re: Oswald Milne Mackay
Ex parte: The Bankrupt
QLD E754 of 1986
PINCUS J.
BRISBANE
14 NOVEMBER 1986
ote a
can voe,
epee cep oe
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
GENERAL DIVISTON ) OLD E754 of 1986
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN )
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND )
RE: OSWALD MILNE MACKAY
EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT
MINUTES OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: PINCUS J.
DATE OF ORDER: 14 NOVEMBER 1986
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The bankrupt be discharged, but the operation of
this order be suspended until 26 November 1986
subject to the condition that the bankrupt
undertake to the Court not to carry on business on
his own account or in partnership, execute any
guarantee or hold office as a director of a
company, until 26 November 1987.
NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in
Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
rm oor
wry
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
ww
QLD E754 of 1986
~~
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
~
RE: QSWALD MILNE MACKAY
EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT
PINCUS J. 14 NOVEMBER 1986
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant became bankrupt on his own petition on 26
November 1984 and now applies for an order of discharge.
The statement of affairs disclosed liabilities of
$91,095, and assets of no substantial amount. Proofs of debt for
amounts totalling $55,580.89 were lodged, according to the
Official Receiver''s report, and there is no prospect of a
dividend.
The report says that the bankrupt returned to Australia
from New Zealand in 1978 accompanied by his wife; they had
$300,000 in cash and invested the money in real estate at the Gold
Coast, and also by way of loan to a company, Caprino Pty. Limited.
That company, also, bought real property, using funds given to it
by the bankrupt and his wife. In 1981, the company bought land at
the Gold Coast for sub-division, and in the same year the Gold
' N
Deen reve sone
oer
ware see eae gy
wer uptn pae er reer ee
lee
aaron
SSM TT
.
Coast City Council is said to have trespassed upon the land in
question. That led to some expensive litigation which had an
unsatisfactory outcome so far as Caprino Pty. Limited was
concerned. The company apparently got into financial difficulties
and property it owned in Brisbane was sold by the mortgagee, the
National Australia Bank. Money which had been borrowed by Caprino
Pty. Limited was the subject of guarantees by the applicant and
his wife.
In 1983, the applicant and his wife entered into a
further venture, through a company called Bafero Pty. Limited,
borrowing money in the process. Its principal or only business
appears to have been a haberdashery shop at Tweed Heads which was
unsuccessful, and the company went into liquidation. Although,
according to the applicant, he did not guarantee Bafero Pty.
Limited's debts, he says that through an error he was made liable
for them.
The Official Receiver's opinion is that the main causes
of bankruptcy were the failure of the two companies I have
mentioned.
There is evidence of some gambling activities. The
applicant told the Official Receiver he was making substantial
amounts from punting up to August 1984, and that he continued
gambling after his bankruptcy, but with smaller sums. The
applicant told me that he wished to obtain a discharge to do work
for "some business people from Malaysia, who are interested in me
spending time in Malaysia on their behalf, with alternate trips
at een
wearers eae
sepa
Ree pe rere,
pn a oe
back to Australia". He said the people in question might pay him
"somewhere around $30,000" and that he could not do the work while
he remained a bankrupt.
In Re Zion (unreported, 26 September 1986), Smithers J.
said:
"In my view it is the policy of the law that
bankruptcy should in most cases come to an end at
three years and when there is an objection, at the
end of five years from the decree for sequestration
of the estate ...""
His Honour referred to Re Maher (1985) 61 A.L.R. 592 at p.598,
that being a decision which I have followed on a number of
occasions. In particular, I have applied the view of Woodward Jd.
in that case that some "cogent ground or grounds" must be shown
for the exercise of discretion in the applicant's favour - see
pp.601, 602.
Here, the bankruptcy has subsisted for nearly two years.
On the evidence I find that the cause of the bankruptcy was the
failure of each of the two several business ventures mentioned
above - i.e. that by Caprino Pty. Limited and that by Bafero Pty.
Limited. None of the creditors has opposed the application. The
applicant is 60 years of age and if he is ever to re-establish
himself commercially it must be fairly soon. However, applying
the "cogent ground" test, the case is, in my opinion, a marginal
one. I think an order should be made enabling the applicant to
take employment, but subject to conditions designed to prevent him
tm rpwer cee
oid ah eerie
@
aot ns eee
fe oo
end
entering into a business venture during the period 1n which he
would ordinarily have remained a bankrupt.
It appears from Re Mallan (1975) 25 F.L.R. 20 (special
leave refused 7 A.L.R. 259) that the power to impose a condition
given by s.150(9)(c) may extend beyond a period of suspension;
it is necessary to have a suspension to enable a condition to be
attached, as I read the provision. It will therefore be ordered
that the bankrupt be discharged, but the operation of this order
1s suspended, subject to the following condition, until 26
November 1986. The condition is that the bankrupt undertake to
the Court not to carry on business on his own account or in
partnership, execute any guarantee or hold office as a director of
a company, until 26 November 1987. If the undertaking is given,
then the bankrupt will be bound by the condition until the date on
which he would, apart from this order, have obtained his
discharge; if the applicant is not willing to give the
undertaking, the application will simply be dismissed.
1 certify that this and the 3 preceding
Pages are a true copy of the reasons for
judgrrent herein of His Honour
Mr. Justice Pincus pb eg Bn .
Asséciatq
Dated 1p Weve Leer 1986,
oy
iene Radler moll a iene Sian nna es eae
ou -to° en ae
ef
Tor
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.