Federal Court of Australia
NOL cOn DLSYRLBUILON
S4a IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION
QLD. G97 of 1984
BETWEEN :
VANCLEVE PTY. LTD. (as Trustee for the VANCLEVE UNIT TRUST)
Applicant AND: DOROTEA PTY.LTD. Respondent AND: DOROTEA PTY. LTD. Cross Claimant AND: VANCLEVE PTY. LTD. (as Trustee for the VANCLEVE UNIT TRUST) : Cross Respondent \ r, SPENDER J. RE 2 4NOV 1936 BRISBANE FEDERAL COURT ge < 7 AUSTRALIA Ad 19 NOVEMBER, 1986. Pa pe ticiPaL om . '
EXTEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application to amend the defence and cross-claim in proceedings involving representations under the
Trade Practices Act 1974. It is necessary to set out some of the
history of the matter.
The applicant commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court
of Queensland by writ number 5160 of 1982 issued on 15 October 1982; on 12 September 1984 the applicant filed the application which commenced these proceedings, and on that day a statement of
claim was filed.
It appears from that statement of claim in the Federal
Court proceedings that the applicant alleged that, prior to the signing of contracts for the purchase of home units, there were representations made by the respondent to the applicant, which
representations constituted false and misleading conduct and
which induced the applicant to purchase the home units.
The statement of claim further pleads that in the premises it was entitled to rescind the contracts, which it claimed lawfully to have done by notices of rescission of 7 September 1982. The application sought a declaration that the three contracts "were rescinded or made void by the applicant on or about 7 September 1982", and sought repayment of deposit moneys or, alternatively, damages pursuant to the Trade Practices Act 1974, or further or other relief pursuant to s.87 of the
Trade Practices Act 1974.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate