Federal Court of Australia
Trade Practices - secondary boycott - application for interlocutory injunction - applicant contracted to carry cut work on building project - alleged ban by first and second respondents on installation of equipment by contractors engaged by applicant - whether in contravention of s.45D of Trade Practices Act - summary of relevant principles - whether serious question to be tried - alleged detriment to applicant if ban allowed to continue - balance of convenience - relevant conduct the subject of a notification to Conciliation and Arbitration Commission - whether a relevant factor in the exercise by the Court of its discretion
to grant the relief sought.
Trade Practices Act 1974 ss. 45D, 80, 80AA
FLOWER DAVIES WEMCO PTY LTD and THE AUSTRALIAN BUILDERS LAROURERS' FEDERATED UNION OF WORKERS WA BRANCH v THE PLUMBERS AND GASFITTERS EMPLOYEES UNION OF AUSTRALIA and THE FEDERATED ENGINE DRIVERS' AND FIREMEN'S UNION
No. WA G118 of 1986
FRENCH ¢. , PERTH ~ 3 DECEMBER 1986
OP AUSTPALIA WESTERN AUS'TRALIA OISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISTON
BETWEEN : PLOWER DAVIES WEMCO PTY LTD
Applicant and THE AUSTRALIAN BUILDERS LABOURERS' FEDERATED UNION OF WORKERS WA BRANCH First Respondent
and
THE PLUMBERS AND GASFITTERS EMPLOYEES UNION OF AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
and
THE FEDERATED ENGINE DRIVERS' AND FIREMEN'S UNION
Third Respondent MINUTE OF PROPOSED ORDER
?
Judge Making Order : FRENCH J. Date of Order : 3rd December 1986 Where Made : Perth
THE COURT ORDERS THAT upon the Applicant having undertaken to pay to any party adversely affected by the interlocutory injunction such compensation (if any) as the Court thinks just in such manner
as the Court directs:
NOTE:
- oot - i? 4 - . 1 ' - . me ut - aw OL Tk Hora . i ~ hee Zi t
Puribop op@e. shir et rould fucert ce vir, the SF
Re Fad
wm
spondent and Second Respondent and each of them be restrained by themselves their servants and agents from imposing waintainzng giving effect to or enforcing any ban on the provision by any person of goods or services to the Applicant at the oremises of the Australian Institute of Management on the corner of Underwood and Birkdale Streets in Floreat Park where any such ban has the purpose and would have or be likely to have the effect of preventing or hindering the acquisition of services by the Applicant from any other person being the lifting of an air handling unit and condensing unit
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate