Federal Court of Australia
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
EXERCISING FEDERAL JURISDICTION 1386
> = Oo
ba]w tJ uu
ry
IN BANKRUFTCY
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF VICTORIA
Re : KENNETH JOHN RICHARDSON and RAELENE CHERYL RICHARDSON
Judgment Debtors
Ex parte: GERALD GLEESON, LORNA GLEESON and DARYL GLEESON
Judgment Creditors
COURT: NORTHROF dg.
DATE: 30 OCTOBER i936
PLACE: MELBOURNE
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is the return for the hearing of a petition in which the judgment creditors, Gerald Gleeson, Lorna Gleeson and Daryl Gleeson, are seeking a sequestration order against the judgment debtors, Kenneth John Richardson and Raelene Cheryl Richardson. The petition 1s founded upon a non-compliance with a bankruptcy notice, Notice of Opposition to the petition has been aqiven on behalf of the
judgment debtors and the ground stated 15 as follows:- ~-
ot as FeO STRALIA
\% PRINCIPAL \ Y REGISTRY
"That the Notice sf Bankruptcy upon wnich the Petition is founded 15 bad in that it does not comply with the Bankruptcy Act or Rules in naming both Judgmenc Debtors on the ne Notice, Accordingly, there nas been no ace af bankruptcy and the Fetiticon 15 without foundation. '
1 Ob
The parties have agreed that the issue caised by that grouna should be argued separately aS a preliminary 1ssue before considering other matters raised in that notice or
opposition, and tne Court has agreed to anopr that course.
The bankruptcy notice in the present case is dated 3 June 1386 and is based upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Victoria which was made on 25 March 1986 in which the judgment creditors were named as plaintiffs and the
judgment debtors were named as defendants. The order was that the judgment debtors pay to the judgment creditors an amount of $285,000 and as far as I " encw, there has been no stay of that judgment, although part of the money was not due to be paid before 14 April 1986. The bankruptcy notice was issued after that date, 14 April, and in the bankruptcy notice the judgment debtors are named as the debtors and the creditors as the judgment creditors and is directed to the two debtors and requires them to pay the sum of $285,000 which is due to the judgment creditors under a final judgment obtained against the debtors in tha Supreme Court at
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate