Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
Practice and Procedure - discovery and interrogatories - proceedings for declaration that respondents breached secrecy provisions of statutes - privilege against self-incrimination - whether respondents should be excused, in limine, from discovery.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth.), s.16
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth.), s.70
Evidence Act 1906 (W.A.), s.1ll.
Federal Court Rules 0.15 rr.1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 0.16 r.1
W.A. Pines Pty. Ltd. v. Bannerman (1980) 41 F.L.R. 175 Barnard v. National 'Dock Labour Board [1953] 2 Q.B. 18
Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte
Herbage (No. 2) (1987) 2 W.L.R. 226. Redfern v. Redfern [1891] P.139
Pyneboard Proprietary Limited v. Trade Practices Commission (1983) 152 C.L.R. 328.
Lamb v. Munster (1882) 10 Q.B.D. 110.
Sorby v. The Commonwealth (1983) 152 C.L.R. 281.
Controlled Consultants Pty. Ltd. v. Commissioner for Corporate Affairs (1985) 57 A.L.R. 751.
Naismith v. McGovern (1953) 90 C.L.R. 336.
Refrigerated Express Lines (A/asia) Pty. Ltd. v. Australian Meat and Live-stock Corp. (1979) 42 F.L.R. 204.
The King v. The Associated Northern Collieries (1910) 11 C.L.R. 738.
Re Intercontinental Development Corporation Pty. Ltd. (1975)
A.C.L.R. 253.
Rank Film Distributors Ltd. v. Video Information Centre [1982] A.C. 380
Sankey v. Whitlam (1978) 142 C.L.R. 1.
Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation (1978] A.C. 547.
Woods v. Smith (1976) W.A.R. 13
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION (W.A.) & ORS. EX PARTE: PETER BRIGGS
©
No. WAG 14 of 1987
Beaumont, J. Sydney
6 March 1987
FEDERAL COURT OF
AUSTRALIA
PRINGIP, REGISTRY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
" WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No.WAG 14 of 1987
ere ay ee wee GENERAL DIVISION ) mre F APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF a? PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS AND x DECLARATIONS a - BETWEEN : DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION : (W.A.) * First respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate