Re Bawn, J.W. v. Ex parte Trade Credits Ltd [1987] FCA 167
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
*%
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION
iG]
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE
STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND
THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
)
)
}
) No P 1999 of 1986
)
)
)
Re: JOHN WORTHY BAWN
Judgment Debtor
Respondent
Ex parte: TRADE CREDITS LID. a
Applicant™
CORAM : E1nfeld J. =P
DATE : 17 March 1987 . Lo
FEDERAL CCURT OF
to. AUSTRALIA
EX-TEMPORE JUDGMENT \. PRINCIPAL
This 18 an application by the creditor presenting a petition the
bankruptcy of the respondent that a notice of discovery dated 23
February 1987 (exhibit C) be set aside or, alternatively, that the
discovery should be limited in some way.
The notice of discovery was issued pursuant to rule 146 of the
Bankruptcy Rules in accordance, as that rule provides, with form 50.
Foxm 50 makes two alternative schemes available for discovery. One is
precisely in the terms of rule 146 that documents be discovered
"relating to the matters that are in question in the proceeding"; the
other is a provision that documents be discovered relating to "the
following matters that are in question in the proceeding". If the
second alternative were adopted, the suggested matters would obviously
be listed by the applicant for the discovery. In this case, the
applicant for discovery being the alleged debtor has chosen the first
and most general provision, which strictly accords with the words of
rule 146.
Rule 147 makes provision for the mechanism of discovery by an affidavit,
and also provides for the form and content of the affidavit. Rule 148
makes provision for an application to be made to the court by a party in
relation to discovery without limiting the potential applicants only to
those who would seek discovery. In other words, it would seem that the
court may be approached by any party to a proceeding in relation to
discovery matters, including the recipient of a requisition for
discovery.
Rule 148 goes on to provide that on such application, the court may make
such order for the "filing of an affidavit of discovery or a further
affidavit of discovery as the court considers necessary in order to
dispose fairly of the matters in question or to save costs in the
proceeding." This provision presumably implies that the court may not
only make such order but decline to make such order.
In this case, 1t does not appear to me to be appropriate to decline to
make an order for the filing of an affidavit of discovery, because the
proposed contested bankruptcy petition, which is set down for hearing
hext month, may very well raise issues for which discovery 1s
appropriate and in relation to which the respondent may be entitled to
documents in the possession of the applicant.
The question in this case is therefore whether there ought to be made an
order pursuant to rule 148 of a limited kind in terms of confining the
affidavit of discovery.
In the course of argument, Mr. Newton for the respondent outlined a
series of issues which he says will arise at the hearing of the
petition. I do not take him to have attempted today to provide a
comprehensive list of such issues, but that the seven or eight that he
outlined were mere examples of some of the issues that would be proposed
to be raised in defence of the petition.
Some of the issues which he raised go to the very basis upon which the
bankruptcy notice which preceded the petition was issued, including the
validity in the sense of the appropriateness and correctness of the
judgment of the Supreme Court of Queensland on which the bankruptcy
notice was based. I asked counsel in argument whether there was a case
1n which the bankruptcy jurisdiction has been energised in these
circumstances for the purpose of relitigating and re-examining the basis
of the judgment preceding a bankruptcy notice and neither party was able
to refer me to to any such decision. Because of the urgency of this
matter, I am not able to search for authority myself.
In any event, it is not necessary to decide the question now nor does it
seem to me to be appropriate that I should prejudge the issue when the
matter is still to be litigated. The problem is that 1f all of the
INMatters that led up to the proceedings in the Supreme Court of
Queensland from the judgment of which the bankruptcy notice stems, there
would be no end of documents that might be produceable on discovery. On
the evidence before me this would not only be time consuming, but
apparently very costly and inconvenient, because, as I am informed, most
if not all of these documents are in Queensland, and are being used in
other proceedings.
In the circumstances, it seems to me that I should order that the
respondent should supply to the applicant a list of what it considers
are the matters in question in the contested bankruptcy proceeding and
that an affidavit of discovery should then be filed by the applicant in
respect of those matters in question.
In the event that there is a dispute about any or all of those matters
in question as defined by the respondent, that matter will have to be
determined at the hearing, and the discovery will have to be determined
at that time as well. In order to protect the interests of the parties
as best I can, I shall make orders at the hearing as may seem
appropriate in order to ensure that the minimum injustice is done to the
parties because of the delay, but I see no way at the moment, on an
interlocutory proceeding of this kind, of confining the issues which
would finally determine the matters in respect of which discovery can
legitimately be required.
I therefore order that within seven days the respondent serve upon the
applicant a list of the matters which he alleges are in question in the
contested bankruptcy proceeding. I order that the respondent then file
within fourteen days thereof an affidavit of discovery in respect of
those matters. I grant liberty to apply to the parties on 24 hours'
notice to my associate in respect of disputes which arise 1n relation to
these discovery proceedings. I stand over such other matters arising
under the application as have not been dealt with, including the
question of costs, to the hearing of the bankruptcy petition.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.