Federal Court of Australia
y a £ LATCH ECS
Administrative Law - Tudisial raview - decision sf Jecretary of Department of Aviation pursuant ta the Two Airlines Agreement - whether reviewable under Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (C'th.)} Issue estoppel - operation where some issues determined at first instance on application
for declaration under 5.13(4A).
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (C'th) ss.3, 13.
Airlines Agreement Act 1981 (C'th) and Schedule
RAD MARTIN TAYLOR v. ANSETT TI2iSPORT INDUSTIIES LIMITED ana AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL AIRLINES COMMISSION
No. G 68 of 1987
Northrop, Fisher and Ryan Jd 13 April 1987
Melbourne
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
) )
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G 68 of 1987 )
GENERAL DIVISION
On Appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Between: RAE MARTIN TAYLOR (who brings this appeal and who was sued in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of Aviation)
(Appellant)
And: ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES LIMITED and AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL AIRLINES COMMISSION
(Respondents)
Court: Northrop, Fisher and Ryan JJ.
Date: 13 April 1987
Place: Melbourne
MINUTE OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The appeal be dismissed with costs.
NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders 1s dealt with in 0.36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) )
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G 68 of 1987 )
GENERAL DIVISION )
ON_APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN : RAE MARTIN TAYLOR (who brings this appeal and who was sued in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of Aviation) Appellant and ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES LIMITED and AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL AIRLINES COMMISSION Respondents COURT: NORTHROP, FISHER AND RYAN JJ. DATE: 13 April 1987 PLACE: MELBOURNE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT NORTHROP J.
In my opinion, the appeal against the order made on 2 February 1987 that the notice of objection to competency be overruled, should be dismissed on the ground that' the decision made by the appellant on 31 October 1986 was a decision of an administrative character made under an enactment within the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 ("the Judicial Review Act"). On this issue I agree with the reasons expressed by Ryan J. and have
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate