Federal Court of Australia
_
[Ss
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Nos. ACT G 64 of 1986, ACT G 65 of 1986,
DISTRICT REGISTRY
ACT G 67 of 1986.
GENERAL DIVISION
) ) } ) ACT G 66 of 1986, ) ) )
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
BETWEEN : HERBERT MAX MICHAELIS and NANCY MABEL MICHAELIS
Appellants
AND: CONTEC NOMINEES PTY. LIMITED
Respondent
MINUTE OF ORDER
Poti
JUDGE MAKING ORDER : Neaves J. nme 2 2 APR 1927 DATE OF ORDER : 15 April 1987 =} FEDERAL COURT OF TA AUSTRALIA WHERE MADE : Canberra an FRUCIPAL THE COURT: ~~ 1. Declares that the applicants, Herbert Max Michaelis
and Nancy Mabel Michaelis are not entitled, either
by virtue of sub-s.60(4) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) or otherwise, to continue in their own names the appeals to this Court from judgments of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, such appeals being numbered ACT G 64 of 1986, ACT G 65 of 1986, ACT G 66 of 1986 and ACT G 67 of 1986.
Orders that the applicants, Herbert Max Michaelis and Nancy Mabel Michaelis, pay the costs of the respondent, Contec Nominees Pty. Limited, of the application.
Declares that it has no jurisdiction to strike out the said appeals numbered ACT G 64 of 1986, ACT G 65 of 1986, ACT G 66 of 1986 and ACT G 67 of 1986.
Directs that the sum of $2,148.29 standing to the credit of the Federal Court of Australia Litigants' Fund on account of Herbert Max Michaelis and Nancy Mabel Michaelis be withdrawn and paid to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy as trustee of the bankrupt estates of the said Herbert Max Michaelis
and Nancy Mabel Michaelis.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders 1s dealt with in Order 36
of the Rules.
Federal Court Rules and in rule 124 of the Bankruptcy
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Nos. ACT G 64 of 1986, ACT G 65 of 1986, ACT G 66 of 1986, ACT G 67 of 1986.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate