Federal Court of Australia
25%
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
No. G 85 of 1982
BETWEEN : KENT HEATING LIMITED Applicant AND: PEUREN AGENCIES Pry. LIMITED
First respondent JOHN CLARENCE BRIDGE Second respondent
CAN-FAB ENGINEERING PTY. LIMITED
Third respondent
HI-TECH COATING SYSTMES PLY. LIMITED (formerly Durelink Engineering Pty.
Limited)
Fourth respondent
MINUTE OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER : Neaves J. ae DATE OF ORDER ° : 3 April 1987 1 FEDERAL AUSTRALIRT O8 WHERE MADE : Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
lL.
The first and second respondents within 14 days from the date of this order make further answer, verified by affidavit in accordance with Order 16, rule 7 of the Federal Court Rules, to the interrogatories set out in the notice dated 27 February 1986 served by the applicant on the first and second respondents and numbered 22, 25, 37(a), 40, 58 and 59(f).
2. Otherwise, the motion notice of which was given on 14 August 1986 be dismissed.
3. The applicant pay three-quarters of the costs of the first and second respondents of the motion.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
)
}
)
) Wo. G 85 of 1982 DISTRICT REGISTRY } ) )
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN : KENT HEATING LIMITED Applicant AND: PEUREN AGENCIES PTY. LIMITED
First respondent
JOHN CLARENCE BRIDGE
Second respondent
CAN-FAB ENGINEERING PTY. LIMITED
Third respondent
HI-TECH COATING SYSTMES
PIrY. LIMITED (formerly Durelink Engineering Pty. Limited)
Fourth respondent
CORAM: Neaves d.
DATE: 3 April 1987
. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Kent Heating Limited ("the applicant") has applied to the Court by motion on notice that Peuren Agencies Pty. Limited ("the first respondent") and John Clarence Bridge ("the second respondent") be ordered to make further answer, verified by affidavit in accordance with 0.16, r.7 of the Federal Court Rules, to a number of interrogatories set out in a notice dated
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate