Federal Court of Australia
gs
7%
3a
IN THE FEDERAL COURT Of AUSTRALIA )
"Ce ef fore
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY )
GENERAL DIVISTON ) BETWEEN: DAREDE NOMINEES PTY. LID.
JUDGE MAKING ORDER:
Applicant
OLD G81 of 1987
AND: CABOOLTURE 24 HOUR MEDICAL CENTRE PTY. LTD.
First Respondent
AND: GEOFFREY WALTER EDELSTEN
Second Respondent
AND: LEANNE MARGARET EDELSTEN
Third Respondent
AND: STEPHEN FRANCIS WELLER
Fourth Respondent
AND: RALEMA PTY. LTD.
Fifth Respondent
MINUTES OF ORDER
PINCUS J.
DATE OF ORDER:
WHERE MADE:
10 JULY 1987
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.
The application for disclosure of information he
dismissed.
The costs of the application be reserved.
Settlement and entry of orders is dealt within
Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. os
\ '
AAR MH AL
.
rey a
a,
a Pent ees ee
we ne
.
TOTTI re ese ene) enue nnn mame ey a me ek eee Ho 2 ' : a ne' oo. =
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY ) QLD G81 of 1987
GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: DAREDE NOMINEES PTY. LTD. Applicant
AND: CABOOLTURE 24 HOUR MEDICAL CENTRE PTY. LTD.
First Respondent
AND: GEOFFREY WALTER EDELSTEN
Second Respondent
AND: LEANNE MARGARET EDELSTEN
Third Respondent
AND: STEPHEN FRANCIS WELLER
Fourth Respondent
AND: RALEMA PTY. LTD.
Fifth Respondent
PINCUS J. 10 JULY 1987
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter, I made an order on 19 June 1987 under
what is described as the Mareva principle. The bases on which I made that order are set out in the reasons I then gave, and included acceptance that the applicant had a good prima facie case
that it had been deceived as to the security which would he
ee
et me ee wee ' 8
my er ree eee -
one wea ee an
pen
available and given. The orders which I then made did not include
any order for disclosure of information, although one was sought.
Upon senior counsel for the respondents intimating that he was unprepared to argue that aspect of the matter, it was adjourned and has been heard today, Mr. Newton of counsel appearing for the applicant, and Mrs. Wolfe of counsel for the respondents. Mr. Newton has argued, and Mrs. Wolfe concedes, that there is jurisdiction to make such an order as is in question, and
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate