Federal Court of Australia
467 2
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) )
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G624 of 1986 ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: W. & J. INVESTMENTS LTD. Appellant AND: THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
MINUTES OF ORDER
Court: Beaumont, Burchett and Einfeld JJ. Date order made: 28 August 1987 Where made: Sydney
THE COURT ORDERS:
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Orders of the Supreme Court of New South Wales set aside; a new trial ordered.
3. No order as to costs of the hearing in the Supreme Court or of the appeal.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G624 of 1986
) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN : W. & J. INVESTMENTS LTD. Appellant AND: THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
CORAM: Beaumont, Burchett and Einfeld JJ.
PLACE: Sydney
DATED: 28 August 1987
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BEAUMONT J. W. & J. Investments Ltd. appeals from orders made by a Judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales dismissing its appeal against the Commissioner's assessment of the income tax payable by it in respect of the year of income ended 30 June 1979. The appeal raises for determination the proper construction of the "investment allowance" provisions (ss.82AA and 82AB in Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part III) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 ("the Act") as they stood in
1979. They may be summarised, so far as relevant, as follows:
(1)
(2)
(3)
2.
Subdivision B applies in relation to a unit of eligible property acquired by a taxpayer that 1s a "leasing company", for use wholly and exclusively in Australia and for the purpose of producing assessable income, by another person to whom the taxpayer has, on or after 1 January 1976, leased the eligible property under a long-term lease agreement that was entered into by the taxpayer in the course of carrying on business in Australia and was so entered into by the taxpayer and
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate