Federal Court of Australia
t /SUDGMENT No. 943/31.
Banking (Foreign Exchange) Regulations - Meaning of "forfeiture"
CATCHWORDS
under regulation 42(2) - Whether a Judge could validly order "the forfeiture of bank drafts (there being a large number of drafts in more than one currency) in the amount of $10,000" - Meaning and possible operation of such an order in respect of the exchange of currencies - Appropriate order where purported
forfeiture of drafts seized from the bankrupt was held invalid.
Banking Act 1959, s.39 Banking (Foreign Exchange) Regulations, reg.42
PETER WILLIAM GOTTSCHALD AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF AFIF SARKIS -V- THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ORS.
W.573 of 1984
Burchett J. Sydney 12 October 1987
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA GENERAL DIVISION BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF
NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
wee
No. W.573 of 1984
BETWEEN:
lz a i]
AND:
BURCHETT J.
PETER WILLIAM GOTTSCHALD as trustee
of the bankrupt estate of AFIF SARKIS
Applicant
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
THE COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
Third Respondent
This 1S an application and cross-application in respect
of the administration of an estate of a bankrupt. The issue
arises under the Banking Act 1959 and the Banking (Foreign
Exchange) Regulations made pursuant to that Act, particularly
regulation 42(2) which provides:
2.
"Subject to sub-regulations (3) and (4) [which are designed to exclude the case of an innocent owner and to ensure that such a person has an opportunity to demonstrate his innocence] where a person has been convicted by a court of an offence against' these Regulations, the court may, 1f it thinks fit, order the forfeiture of all or any of the articles in respect of which the offence was
committed."
The circumstances out of which the present questions arise may be briefly recounted. Mr. Sarkis was made a bankrupt on 22 June 1984, when the applicant became his trustee. Prior to his bankruptcy, Mr. Sarkis was (on 10 February 1984) convicted in
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate