Federal Court of Australia
—
—*
JUDGMENT No. 49 [Bm
IN THE FEDERAL. COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
(NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION)
No. VG I50 of 1987
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
EMMANUEL RUSIANA DEMETITA Applicant and ANTHONY EARNEST FAUBEL (who is sued in his capacity as Delegate of the Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs)
Respondent
No. VG 151 of 1987
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
EMMANUEL RUSIANA DEMETITA Applicant
and MICHAEL JEROME YOUNG (who is sued in his capacity as the Minister of State for the Commonwealth of Australia for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs)
Respondent
.
a >,
we a OT
aes rer er
we ae yey sere 7 7
—
[ i f |
MINUTES OF ORDER
COURT: Woodward J.
DATE: 12 June 1987
PLACE: Melbourne
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The applications, in VG 150 of 1987 and VG 151 of 1987,
be dismissed with costs.
eee
NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
ee ta Hee ees
or5ee oy
—
men a tee we ee
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY No. VG 150 of 1987
et ere we
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
EMMANUEL RUSIANA DEMETITA Applicant
and
ANTHONY EARNEST FAUBEL
(who is sued in his capacity as Delegate of the Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs)
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY No. VG 151 of 1987
eee
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
EMMANUEL RUSIANA DEMETITA Applicant and MICHAEL JEROME YOUNG (who is sued in his capacity as the Minister of State for the Commonwealth of Australia for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs)
Respondent
COURT: Woodward J.
DATE: 12 June 1987
PLACE: Melbourne
wey ee
ree
pore eee
oa
Price see eter esp ter eee
we
RARER ee we ore aoe
wT
EX-TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter I have before me two applications. The first, in matter VG 150 of 1987, seeks an interlocutory injunction staying the deportation of the applicant, who has applied for judicial review of various decisions taken under the Migration Act 1958, the end result of which would be his deportation. I am also asked, in matter No VG 151 of 1987, to rule that the reasons which have been supplied to the applicant pursuant to the Administrative Decisions (Judicial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate