Federal Court of Australia
JUDGMENT No. Ta] WA
CATCHWORDS
Damages for personal injury - challenge to assessment of damages for whiplash injury resulting in fusion of cervical spine at two levels - plaintiff found to be totally incapacitated for work - award of $541,132.59 said to be excessive - analysis of amounts included in the award for loss of past and future earning capacity and for general damages - amount, although high, not found to be excessive -
no question of principle.
Bresatz and Another v. Przibilla and Another (1962) 108
C.L.R. 541 at p.544
AUSTRALIAN POSTAL COMMISSION v. WARREN WILLIAM GORDON
GRIFFITHS
No. ACT G29 of 1987
Coram: Sheppard, Neaves and Miles JJ. Place: Canberra Date: 15 December 1987
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
No. ACT G29 of 1987
GENERAL DIVISION
On Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN POSTAL COMMISSION
Appellant AND: WARREN WILLIAM GORDON GRIFFITHS Respondent
JUDGES MAKING ORDER: : SHEPPARD, NEAVES AND MILES JJ. DATE OF ORDER: 15 DECEMBER 1987
WHERE MADE: CANBERRA
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
No. ACT G29 of 1987
GENERAL DIVISION
On Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN POSTAL COMMISSION
Appellant AND: WARREN WILLIAM GORDON GRIFFITHS Respondent
CORAM: SHEPPARD, NEAVES and MILES JJ.
DATE: 15 DECEMBER 1987
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT THE COURT: This 1S an appeal by the defendant, Australian Postal Commission, against an award of damages in the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory in favour of the plaintiff, Warren William Gordon Griffiths.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate