Federal Court of Australia
ee
YUDGMENT No. ACO.7.BB.. CATCHWORDS
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal
in relation to an application under the Veterans' Entitlements
Act 1986 - Meaning of "reasonable hypothesis" - Whether the Material raised a reasonable hypothesis - Question of fact for
the Tribunal ~- No error of law shown.
Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, ss.9, 120.
WILLIAM RUSSELL HOOKE -V- THE REPATRIATION COMMISSION
NSW G.578 of 1986
Spender, Burchett & Einfeld JJ. Sydney 11 February 1988
re
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G.578 of 1986
) GENERAL DIVISION )
~
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: WILLIAM RUSSELL HOOKE
Applicant
THE REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
MINUTE OF ORDER OF THE COURT
Judges Making Order: Spender, Burchett & Einfeld JJ. Where Made: Sydney Date of Order: 11 February 1988
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
(1) The appeal be dismissed.
(2) The applicant pay to the respondent its costs of the appeal.
NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders are dealt with in Order
36 of the Federal Court Rules.
ae as
eA es
mere emma me sete we eeemnee ©
hoe ts
eee taiene
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
) ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G.578 of 1986 ) )
GENERAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM RUSSELL HOOKE
Applicant
REPATRIATION COMMISSION Respondent
CORAM: Spender, Burchett & Einfeld JJ. PLACE: Sydney DATE: 11 February 1988
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT
This is an appeal, so called, from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Veterans' Appeals Division, which affirmed a decision of the Veterans' Review Board, given on 6 September 1985, affirming a decision of the Repatriation Board to reject claims made by the applicant in respect of conditions of oesophageal reflux and lumbar spondylosis. The applicant has been diagnosed as suffering from these conditions, which he alleged were war related in a sense appropriate to attract the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate