Mainbanner Pty Ltd & Ors v. Dadincroft Pty Ltd & Ors [1988] FCA 149

TRADE PRACTICES - misleading or deceptive conduct - claim by mortgagor against mortgagee - application for interlocutory relief restraining mortgagee from exercising its security - payment into Court not possible - Court's discretion to relax that requirement - serious question to be tried - allegations

of misleading conduct not overwhelmingly strong - whether special principle where rescission sought.

BILL

Trad

No. \YA.L.BS-.

o— ~|

JUDGME?

CATCHWORDS

OF SALE - interlocutory application to restrain grantee from exercising security pending Trade Practices application.

e Practices Act 1974, s.52

Mainbanner Pty. Ltd. & Ors v. Dadincroft Pty. Ltd. & Ors Qld G55 of 1988 ere ONE pay Sou a fart ga 5 tte rS Ofer oiny \- . Gan, 99 fy PINCUS _J. a a ee ee BRISBANE aS oe rs 8 MARCH 1988 _ iy e A . aN

oe ce

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY ) QLD G55 of 1988

GENERAL DIVISION )

BETWEEN: MAINBANNER PTY. LTD.

First Applicant

AND: ROBERT BERNARD LUBKE

Second Applicant AND: ANNETTE LUBKE

Third Applicant AND: DADINCROFT PTY. LTD.

First Respondent

AND: OSWALD HENRY BLACKER and DOROTHY CLAIRE BLACKER

Second Respondents

MINUTES OF ORDER

JUDGE MAKING ORDER: PINCUS J. DATE OF ORDER: 8 MARCH 1988 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.

2.

the application for interlocutory relief be dismissed;

the costs of the application for interlocutory relief be the respondents' costs in any event.

Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federai Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY ) QLD G55 of 1988 GENERAL DIVISION )

BETWEEN: MAINBANNER PTY. LTD.

First Applicant AND: ROBERT BERNARD LUBKE

Second Applicant AND: ANNETTE LUBKE

Third Applicant AND: DADINCROFT PTY. LTD.

First Respondent AND: OSWALD HENRY BLACKER and DOROTHY CLATRE BLACKER

Second Respondents