Federal Court of Australia
JUDGMENT No. 2&27SS
f_seescemeceetoeens
CATCHWORDS
Trade Practices Act s.52 - Sale of goodwill of business allegedly
exploiting a secret formula - No secret formula in reality - Orders made under s.87 including orders for refunding of moneys paid and payment of compensation by way of interest - Scope of
s.87.
Trade Practices Act 1974, ss.52, 87.
DEANE & ORS -V- BRIAN HICKEY INVENTION RESEARCH PTY LIMITED &
ANOR
NSW G.17 of 1987
Burchett J. Sydney 6 July 1988
- f See . rv ae | woo yt rel eee? fot i> . i; \ \ Y ,
x es /
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G17 of 1987 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN:
REGINALD ERIC DEANE and DEBORAH ANN DEANE
First Applicants
DHC ROOF REPAIRS PTY LIMITED
Second Applicant
BRIAN HICKEY INVENTION RESEARCH PTY LIMITED
First Respondent
BRIAN JAMES HICKEY
Second Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BURCHETT J.
In or about the year 1975 Mr. Noel vail, a chemical engineer and the New South Wales Manager of the Plastics Division of Ciba-Geigy Australia Limited, devised a waterproof coating with high resistance to ultra-violet light degeneration for use in situations exposed to full sun. Mr. Vail did not claim to have made any startling new discovery. He had utilized acrylic resin, an appropriate solvent, and an ultra-violet stabiliser which Ciba-Geigy had developed in Switzerland, known as tinuvin.
Since the material was intended to have a particular application
2.
as a coating for swimming pool surrounds, it was sold as "Pebble
Coat LC263".
About 1978, Mr. Hickey (the second respondent, who is a director of the first respondent which I shall call his company) approached Ciba-Geigy to obtain a substance suitable for application to roofs. He was provided with some Pebble Coat LC263, which proved so satisfactory that thereafter he purchased substantial quantities of the substance. He sprayed it on deteriorated tile, slate, cement, asbestos-cement, and iron roofs. Mr. Hickey was engaged, through his company, in the business of roof restoration, for the purposes of which he followed a particular procedure involving the steam cleaning of
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate