Federal Court of Australia
oa JUDGMENT No. 4877, 38
foseseat ely
CATCHWORDS
INCOME TAX - Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s.51(1) -
allowable deductions - both taxpayer and wife working - no facilities for child care at work - child minding expenses - whether incurred in gaining or producing assessable income -
whether of private or domestic nature - appeal dismissed.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 s.51
Lodge v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1972-73) 128 CLR 171 Ronpibon Tin NL v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR Lunney v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478 Martin v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 84 ATC 4513
DOUGLAS JOHN HYDE v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION No. WAG 10 of 1988
FRENCH J. PERTH 14 MARCH 1988
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION
wes ww
No. WAG 10 of 1988
BETWEEN: DOUGLAS JOHN HYDE Applicant
and
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
MINUTE OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: FRENCH J. DATE OF ORDER: 14 MARCH 1988 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application will be dismissed.
2. The applicant 1s to pay the respondent's costs of the
application.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in
Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION
we eww
No. WAG 10 of 1988
BETWEE N?: DOUGLAS JOHN HYDE Applicant
and
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent
CORAM: FRENCH J. 14 March 1988
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an appeal by a taxpayer against the disallowance by the Commissioner of Taxation of a claim for child minding expenses incurred in the financial year ended 30 June 1987. The amount of expenses so claimed in the taxpayer's return for that year totalled $3,640. However, he conceded at the hearing of his appeal, that he can only produce documentary evidence of payments totalling $2,850 and so reduces his claim for deduction to that
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate