Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
) WESTERN AUSTRALIA 5 ) )
DISTRICT REGISTRY No. WAG 215 of 1992
GENERAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL from his Honour, Mr Justice Lee, in the Federal Court of Australia
BETWEEN:
ZHANG DE YONG Applicant
- and -
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS
Respondent
CORAM: | BLACK CJ, LOCKHART and FRENCH JJ PLACE: PERTH
DATE: 19 MARCH 1993 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Ex Tempore) THE COURT
The Court is not persuaded that this is a case in which leave to appeal from an interlocutory decision from a judge of this Court should be granted. The points that it is desired to raise on appeal, if leave were granted, are points of substantial importance but we see no compelling reason why these points should not be argued in the ordinary way at the trial. In particular, we are not persuaded that any serious
practical inconvenience would result to the Minister if leave to appeal were refused
and the matter were to proceed to trial in the ordinary way. Accordingly, we would dismiss the application for leave to appeal and order that the respondent to the
proceedings pay the applicant's costs.
I certify that this and the preceding page is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Court.
Associate:
Date: nf 3f9
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate