Federal Court of Australia
JUDGMENT Now ue 22 snal wnt ne
CATCHWORDS Consumer Protection - Trade Practices - Misleading or
Deceptive Conduct - bank manager advising opal dealer in the
field that a bank cheque was "as good as cash" - bank cheque was a forgery on a stolen bank cheque form - whether misleading or deceptive conduct - whether negligent
misstatement --whether reliance upon the advice.
Trade Practices Act 1974, ss.52, 82
Matter No. SG 54 of 1992
ATHANASIOS LYRITZIS and JANELLE RONDA LYRITZIS v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
VON DOUSSA J
ADELAIDE
RECEIVED ~7 NOV 1994
FEDERAL COURT OF
AUSTRALIA PRINCIPAL REGISTRY
4 NOVEMBER 1994
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION No. SG 54 of 1992
BETWEEN:
ATHANASIOS LYRITZIS and JANELLE RONDA LYRITZIS
Applicants AND:
WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
Respondent
MINUTES OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER s VON DOUSSA J. WHERE MADE $ ADELAIDE DATE OF ORDER 3 4 NOVEMBER 1994
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Judgment for the applicants for $259,464.86.
2. Respondent to pay the applicants' costs to be taxed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) SOUTH AUSTRALIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY ) ) )
GENERAL DIVISION No. SG 54 of 1992
BETWEEN:
ATHANASIOS LYRITZIS and JANELLE RONDA LYRITZIS
Applicants AND:
WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
Respondent. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Coram: von Doussa J. Place: Adelaide Date : 4 November 1994
This is a claim for $170,000 damages plus compound interest alleged to be the loss of the applicants, Mr and Mrs Lyritzis, resulting from misleading and deceptive conduct in trade or commerce, and negligent misstatement, by Robin Ernest
Pearson who at material times was the manager of the Coober
Pedy branch of the respondent Bank.
The applicants carried on business from Coober Pedy in partnership as opal miners and opal dealers. They allege that in reliance upon oral advice given by Mr Pearson on or about Thursday 29 August 1991 Mr Lyritzis accepted four bank cheques purportedly drawn on the ANZ Bank, Dandenong Area Branch, Victoria, from an interstate buyer who was unknown to him in exchange for delivery of cut opals. The pleadings allege that shortly before completion of the transaction Mr Pearson told
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate