Federal Court of Australia
JUDGMENT No. mot D5, CATCHWORDS
COSTS - order that solicitor pay difference between party and party costs recoverable by opposite party under costs order against solicitor's client and opposite party's solicitor and client costs on principles applicable.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 - s 32 Bankruptcy Rules - r 146
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 - s 43 Federal Court Rules - 0 62 r 9 English Rules of Court - O LXV s li
Bent v Gough (1992) 36 F.C.R. 204 Applied
Caboolture Park Shopping Centre Pty, Ltd. (in liquidation) v White Industries (Old.) Pty. Ltd. (1993) 45 F.C.R. 224 Applied Feliz v General Dental Council {1960} A.C. 704 Referred to
Myers v Elman [{1940] A.C. 282 Followed Orchard v South Eastern Electricity Board [1987] 1 Q.B. 565
Referred to (1990) 26 F.C.R. 592 Referred to
Ex parte Meehan: Re Medical Practitioners Act [1965] N.S.W.R. 30 Referred to
ART 1 of 1992
SS
RECEIVED 25 NOV 1994
FEDERAL COURT OF
AUSTRALIA PRINCIPAL REGISTRY
J
No. ART 1 of 1992
)
GENERAL DIVISION )
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF )
THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND ) IN THE MATTER of an application by GRAHAM ROSS BENDEICH of 4 Candlebark Crescent, Chapel Hill, Brisbane in the State of Queensland to be registered as a Trustee under the Bankruptcy Act 1966
MINUTES OF ORDERS
SJUDGE_ MAKING ORDER: Drummond J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 November, 1994
WHERE MADE: Brisbane
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondent Mr. Hewlett pay to the objectors the
difference between their party and party costs of their application filed 28 October, 1992 and heard on 6 November, 1992 recoverable by them from Mr. Bendeich under the order of 6 November, 1992 and the costs they have reasonably incurred to their own
solicitors in connection with their application and ite hearing.
The respondent Mr. Hewlett pay to the objectors the difference between their party and party costs of the application filed on behalf of Mr. Bendeich on 26 November, 1992 recoverable by them from Mr. Bendeich under the order of 1 December, 1992 and the costs they have reasonably incurred to their own solicitors in connection with these applications up to but not including the hearing of that application on 1 December, 1992.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate