Australian Securities Commission v. Macleod, R.J. & Ors [1994] FCA 901

JUDGMENT No. sunt Cadel watt CATCHWORDS

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Where final judgment sought against respondent pursuant to O 10 r 7, applicant must support motion for judgment with material in legally admissible form sufficient to prove: Court's jurisdiction, circumstances justifying grant of discretionary remedy and facts necessary

to prove entitlement to relief claimed under judgment applied for.

Corporations Law - 8 1323

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 - s 4

Federal Court Rules - O 1 r 4, 0 4 rr 1 and 6, 0 10, 010 r 1, 010 r 1(2), 010 r 7, 0 10 r 7(1)(b), O ll r 13, O ll xr 23, ol4er 33 {3 Oo 15 r 16, O 16 r 9, O 19 rr 1(2) and 2(1), 0 33 r 2, 0 33 r 3

v AGC (Advances) Limited (1990) 27 F.C.R. 388 Considered

My_Distributors Pty. Ltd, v OMAO Pty, Ltd. (1992) 36 F.C.R. 578 Approved

Qnslow v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (1890) 25 Q.B.D. 65 Referred to

Qpie v Opie (1951) 84 C.L.R. 362 Referred to Foarte v Button (1986) 8 F.C.R. 408 Referred to v Buchan (ieee) 58 L.T. 710 Referred to fares Poy ind v Waterloo Industries Pty. Ltd, (1986) 66 A.L.R. 537 Referred to Xoung v Thomas [1892] 2 Ch. 135 Considered

Australian Securities Commission v Robert James Macleod & Ors. QG 3011 of 1992

Brisbane 29 NOV 1994 10 November, 1994 FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA PRINGIPAL . REGISTRY . vi a

SN_THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) No. QG 3011 of 1992

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT JAMES MACLEOD AND OTHERS

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION Applicant

ROBERT JAMES MACLEOD

First Respondent

TRAINEX PTY, LID. A.C.N. 001506332

Second Respondent

A.C.N. 051750442

Third Respondent

A.C.N. 055168128

Fourth Respondent

STAR PARTNERS PTY. LTD. A.C.N. 055168155

Fifth Respondent

MINUTES OF ORDERS

JUDGE MAKING ORDER: Drummond J DATE OF ORDER: 10 November, 1994 WHERE MADE: Brisbane

The matter is adjourned to Tuesday, 22 November, 1994 at 9.00 a.m.