Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS CONTRACT - contract claimed to have arisen from conversations and correspondence - whether communications in contemplation of reaching a binding agreement have formed a contract - whether parties intended to form a concluded bargain - legal principles discussed. TRADE PRACTICES - misleading or deceptive conduct - Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 - Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s 47 - whether misrepresentations made as to approval by the respondent to inclusion of applicant in Egg Marketing Scheme. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51AB(6), s 52 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s 47 Co-operation Act 1923 (NSW) Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 Rossiter v Miller (1878) 3 App Cas 1124 Santa Fe Land Co Ltd v Forestal Land Timber & Railways Co Ltd (1910) 26 TLR 534 Air Great Lakes Pty Ltd v K S Easter (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 309 Allen v Carbone (1975) 132 CLR 528 Inland Revenue Commissioners v Raphael (1935) AC 96 Austotel Pty Ltd v Franklins Selfserve Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 582 Barrier Wharfs Ltd v W Scott Fell & Co Ltd (1908) 5 CLR 647 Howard Smith & Co Ltd v Varawa (1907) 5 CLR 68 ABC v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 Hooper v Commonwealth of Australia (Unreported, Sup Ct NSW, Comm Div, Gleeson CJ, 16 Nov 1990) Coal Cliff Collieries Pty Ltd v Sijehama Pty Ltd (1991) 24 NSWLR 1 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Short v The City Bank of Sydney (1912) 15 CLR 148 NICHOLAS IAN FRANCIS v NSW EGG PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE PTY LTD No. NG 540 of 1992 Tamberlin J Sydney 10 March 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY) No. NG 540 of 1992 GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN : NICHOLAS IAN FRANCIS Applicant AND : NSW EGG PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE PTY LTD Respondent NSW EGG PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED Cross-Claimant NICHOLAS IAN FRANCIS and JOSEPH SCHEMBRI Cross-Respondents CORAM : TAMBERLIN J PLACE : SYDNEY DATED : 10 MARCH 1995 MINUTES OF ORDER THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed with costs. 2. The cross-respondents pay the cross-claimant the sum of $129,602 together with interest. 3. The cross-respondents pay the cross-claimant's costs of the cross-claim. NOTE : Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in accordance with Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate