Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION - decision in action reserved following hearing - application for injunction to prevent sale of property - whether a claim for relief which affects the exercise of the bank's rights as a mortgagee to be determined by trial Judge - deterioration in value of property - applicant unable to provide security to safeguard bank's position. MORTGAGEE SALE - sale by private treaty instead of auction, current valuations obtained Trade Practices Act - ss 52,80,87 Inglis v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia (1972) 126 CLR 161 Refd Harvey v McWatters (1949) 49 SR(NSW) 173 Cons Mainbanner Pty Ltd v Lubke & Ors (unreported decision 8.3.88 Pincus J) Refd Town & Country Sports Resort (Holdings) Pty Ltd & Ors v Partnership Pacific Limited (1988) FCR 540 Refd Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Refd Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 Refd David Henry Leitch and Ors v Natwest Australia Bank Limited and Ors No QG174 of 1991 Kiefel J Brisbane 9 March 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION No. QG174 of 1991 BETWEEN: DAVID HENRY LEITCH First Applicant AND: ALMA MARGARET LEITCH Second Applicant AND: GARY DAVID LEITCH Third Applicant AND: GUDE PTY LIMITED (RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED) Fourth Applicant AND: GLEN PACIFIC PTY LIMITED (RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED (IN LIQUIDATION) Fifth Applicant AND: GLANDORE PTY LIMITED (RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) Sixth Applicant AND: NATWEST AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED First Respondent AND: PETER MURRAY WALKER Second Respondent AND: GLANDORE PTY LIMITED (RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) Third Respondent JUDGE MAKING ORDER: Kiefel J. DATE OF ORDER: 9 March 1995 WHERE MADE: Brisbane MINUTES OF ORDERS THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an injunction be dismissed. 2. The fourth applicant pay the first and second respondents' costs of and incidental to the application to be taxed. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate