Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
Administrative Law - acceptance by the Child Support Registrar of an application for administrative assessment of child support - application did not attach proof of paternity satisfying s.29(2) of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) ("the Assessment Act") - whether decision to accept the application was amenable to judicial review. Statutory Interpretation - whether the Federal Court should exercise jurisdiction under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) in relation to decisions made under the Child Support Scheme - whether adequate provision for review within the meaning of s.10(2)(b)(ii) of the ADJR Act is provided by the Assessment Act and the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1989 - whether discretion to dismiss the application should be exercised. F.J. Bloemen Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 360 Colpitts v Australian Telecommunications (1986) 9 FCR 52 at 62-64. Edelsten v Minister for Health (1993) 32 ALD 730 Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd [1995] ATC 4,067 Du Pont (Australia) v Comptroller-General of Customs (1993) 30 ALD 829 Strictly Stainless Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (unreported, 5 November 1993) Swan Portland Cement Ltd v Comptroller-General of Customs (1989) 90 ALR 280 Yarmirr v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1990) 96 ALR 739 Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) - ss.26, 29, 30, 31(1)(d), 99(1), 106, 107 and 108. Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1989 (Cth) - ss.24, 34, 80, 83, 87(1), 88 and 104(1). Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) - ss.66X, 66ZA ROGER EDWARD BROCK v DEPUTY CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR No G96 of 1995 Davies J 23 June 1995 Sydney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No G 96 of 1995 ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: ROGER EDWARD BROCK Applicant AND: DEPUTY CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR Respondent Coram:Davies J. Date: 23 June 1995 Place: Sydney MINUTES OF ORDER THE COURT ORDERS: The application be dismissed with costs. NOTE:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate