Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) ) SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) No. SG 54 of 1994 ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: F W HUGHES PTY LTD Applicant - and - THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent MINUTES OF ORDER CORAM: Branson J. PLACE: Adelaide DATE: 28 June 1995 THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) ) SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) No. SG 54 of 1994 ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: F W HUGHES PTY LTD Applicant - and - THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT CORAM: Branson J. PLACE: Adelaide DATE: 28 June 1995 This matter was argued together with Woolcombers (WA) Pty Ltd v The Commissioner of Taxation. It is agreed that the result of one case determines the result of the other. I have today delivered judgment in the Woolcombers (WA) Pty Ltd Case dismissing the applicant's appeal. The applicant's appeal in this case must similarly be dismissed with costs. I certify that this page is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of Justice Branson. Associate: Dated:
Counsel for the Applicant : Mr M L Robertson QC with him Mr M Manetta Solicitors for the Applicant: Minter Ellison Baker O'Loughlin Counsel for the Respondent : Mr A H Slater QC with him Ms A MacDonald Solicitors for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Hearing Date : 10 March 1995
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate