Nagy, G.M & Anor v Masters Dairy Ltd [1995] FCA 482

CATCHWORDS PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - pleadings - whether embarrassing - pleadings in contract - pleadings relating to alleged misleading and deceptive conduct - whether particulars would remedy - whether summary judgment appropriate in respect of contract action Rules of the Federal Court O11 r16, O20 r2 Turner v Kinian P/L (French J, 19 August 1992, unreported) TPC v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd (1994) 124 ALR 685 Dalgety Australia Ltd v Rubin (FCt, SCt of WA, 1984, library no. 5485; unreported) Kimberley Downs Pty Ltd v Western Australia (Master Staples, SCt of WA, 1986, library no. 6414; unreported) Summerland v NZI Australia Ltd (Foster J, 28 October 1991, unreported). Schwartz v South Australia Public Service Savings and Loans Society Ltd and ors (Branson J, 16 September 1994, unreported). Beach Petroleum ML v Johnson (1991) 105 ALR 456 H1976 Nominees Pty Ltd v Galli (1979) 30 ALR 181 Bruce v Odhams Press Ltd [1936] 1 KB 697 Murray v Macquarie Bank & anor (Spender J, 4 March 1992, unreported) Day v William Hill (Park Lane) LD [1949] 1 KB 632 Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Financings Ltd v Stimson [1962] 1 WLR 1184 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Rameski (1992) 39 FCR 31 Warner v Elders Rural Finance Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 399 Payne v Cave (1789) 3 Term Rep 148 (100 ER 502); [1775-1802] ALL ER 492 Goldsbrough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn (1910) 10 CLR 674 GABOR MARTIN NAGY and PATRICIA DOROTHY NAGY v MASTERS DAIRY LIMITED NO WAG 27 OF 1995 R D NICHOLSON J PERTH 10 JULY 1995

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) GENERAL DIVISION ) NO WAG 27 OF 1995 B E T W E E N: GABOR MARTIN NAGY First Applicant and PATRICIA DOROTHY NAGY Second Applicant and MASTERS DAIRY LIMITED (ACN: 008 671 761) Respondent MINUTE OF ORDER JUDGE MAKING ORDER: R D NICHOLSON J DATE OF ORDER: 10 JULY 1995 WHERE MADE: PERTH THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Paragraphs 3, 5, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the applicant's statement of claim be struck out. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.