Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
APPEALS - whether new point could be taken on appeal - question of fact involving credibility and "estimate of the man". BANKRUPTCY - declaration that trusts were shams and property belonged to the bankrupt - principles - circumstances in which sham could be inferred - evidence of ownership of works of art by bankrupt - whether moneys belonging to others could be traced into property - principles of tracing - whether company holding property for bankrupt could set up a jus tertii - form of relief available - requirement that property to be traced can be identified at every stage of its journey - fraudulent conveyance - in absence of direct assignment, ability of s. 121 to get at beneficial interest in property debtor caused to be received - title of recipient prior to intervention of Official Trustee - right of recipient subject only to rights of creditors - absence of any personal liability against a recipient who has disposed of the property by sale, or by receipt of payment in the case of assignment of a debt - requirement in such a case that Official Trustee be able to trace the proceeds. TRUSTS - constitution - necessity of a real intention to create - transfer of property to a trust - Nemo dat qui non habet - necessity of a real intention to subject property to the trust - circumstances where holding of property in trusts was a sham. Bankruptcy Act 1966, s. 121 Jones v Hyde (1989) 63 ALJR 349 Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Daniels v Burfield (1994) 125 ALR 33 Westpac Banking Corporation v Spice (1990) 12 ATPR 51,386 Donnelly v Edelsten (1994) 49 FCR 384 S.S. Hontestroom v S.S. Sagaporack [1927] AC 37 The Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Jolliffe (1920) 28 CLR 178 Joyce v Ashfield Municipal Council (1967) 14 LGRA 133 Sharrment Pty Ltd v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1988) 18 FCR 449 Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786 Re State Public Services Federation; Ex parte Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia (1993) 178 CLR 249 Dalco v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 669 Re La Rosa; Ex parte Norgard v Rocom Pty Ltd (1990) 21 FCR 270 Norgard as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of La Rosa v Rocom Pty Limited 16 August 1990, unreported, Northrop, Davies and Lee JJ. Hancock v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1961) 108 CLR 258 In re Watson. Ex parte Official Receiver in Bankruptcy (1890) 25 QBD 27 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Biddle v Bond (1865) 6 B & S 225; 122 ER 1,179 Betteley v Reed (1843) 4 QB 511; 114 ER 991 Shields v Jeffries [1953] NZLR 666 Remnant v Savoy Estate Ltd [1949] 1 Ch 622 Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd (in Liquidation) v Homan [1995] Ch 211 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Mitchell (1992) 38 FCR 364 PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Grellman (1992) 35 FCR 515 Williams v Lloyd (1934) 50 CLR 341 Higgins v The York Buildings Company [1740] 2 Atk. 107; 26 ER 467 In re Maddever. Three Towns Banking Company v Maddever [1884] 27 Ch D 523 Harrods, Limited v Stanton [1923] 1 KB 516 Brady v Stapleton (1952) 88 CLR 322 Law Debenture Trust Corporation v Ural Caspian Oil Corporation Ltd [1995] Ch 152 Ideal Bedding Company, Limited v Holland [1907] 2 Ch 157 Barton v Official Receiver (1984) 4 FCR 380 JAMES ANDREW BAKER & ORS v OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY QG 102 of 1994 CORAM: Burchett, Ryan and Carr JJ. PLACE OF HEARING: Brisbane DATE: 3 August 1995
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate