Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS EVIDENCE - documents - privilege - subpoena for production of documents - whether legal professional privilege applicable - third party communications - confidential communications between expert and other party - dominant purpose of communications. Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s117(1), s119(b) National Employers Mutual General Association Limited v Waind and Hill (1978) 1 NSWLR 372 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 Hartogen Energy Ltd (in liq) & ors v The Australian Gas Light Co & ors (1992) 109 ALR 177 Waterford v The Commonwealth of Australia (1987) 163 CLR 54 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 HARDIE FINANCE CORPORATION PTY LTD v CCD AUSTRALIA PTY LTD and ORS NO WG 197 OF 1992 R D NICHOLSON J PERTH 14 JULY 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) GENERAL DIVISION ) NO WG 197 OF 1992 B E T W E E N: HARDIE FINANCE CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 008 992 185) Applicant and CCD AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 008 721 471) First Respondent and RODNEY COLLINS DREW Second Respondent and CCD AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 008 721 471) Cross Claimant and MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD (ACN 008 687 063) First Cross Respondent and ENVAR (73) PTY LTD (ACN 008 959 659) Second Cross Respondent and ENVAR ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS PTY LTD (ACN 009 407 630) Third Cross Respondent CORAM: R D NICHOLSON J DATE: 14 JULY 1995 PLACE: PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate