Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - application to review decision of Refugee Review Tribunal - whether applicants entitled to protection as refugees under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - whether protection visas should be granted - whether decision of Tribunal reasonably open to it on the material before it. IMMIGRATION LAW - refugee status - whether well-founded fear of persecution as a result of illegal departure from China - effect of applicant being an organiser of departure - whether likely punishment for illegal departure constitutes persecution for reasons of political opinion - whether departure an expression of political opinion. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Respondent "A" and Respondent "B" and Janet Wood, The Refugee Review Tribunal (Full Federal Court, unreported, 16 June 1995) C, LJ & Z v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs & Ors (unreported, O'Loughlin J, 30 March 1995) The Law of Refugee Status, James Hathaway, Butterworths Canada Ltd, 1991 "The 1951 Convention Definition of Refugee : An Appraisal with Particular Reference to the Case of Sri Lankan Tamil Applicants", Patricia Hyndman, (1987) 9 Human Rights Quarterly 49. DECISION OF REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL DATED 12 APRIL 1995 TO BE REVIEWED WU GUO XIONG AND JIAN XIU FENG v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS No WG 41 of 1995 Tamberlin J Sydney 9 August 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) WESTERN AUSTRALIA ) DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No WG 41 of 1995 GENERAL DIVISION ) DECISION OF REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL DATED 12 APRIL 1995 TO BE REVIEWED BETWEEN: WU GUO XIONG First Applicant JIAN XIU FENG Second Applicant AND THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ETHNIC AFFAIRS First Respondent JILL TOOHEY Second Respondent CORAM: TAMBERLIN J PLACE OF HEARING: PERTH PLACE OF JUDGMENT:SYDNEY DATED: 9 AUGUST 1995 MINUTE OF ORDERS THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs of this application. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in accordance with Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate