IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA)No. QG 72 of 1991 QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and JEAN TOMLINSON Applicants AND: CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED First Respondent AND: ENZO SGAMBELLONE Second Respondent AND: HARRY MALOVANY Third Respondent AND: PETER HOEFLER Fourth Respondent AND: RON HARMER Fifth Respondent AND: CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED Cross Claimant AND: PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and JEAN TOMLINSON Cross Respondents MINUTES OF ORDERS JUDGE MAKING ORDER: Drummond J DATE OF ORDER: 29 August, 1995 WHERE MADE: Brisbane BY CONSENT THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. There be judgment for the applicants against the first respondent for $57,355.50 in lieu of the judgment pronounced on 12 July, 1995. 2. There be judgment for the applicants against the second respondent for $203,422.50 in lieu of the judgment pronounced on 18 August, 1995. 3. There be judgment for the applicants against the fourth respondent for $203,422.50 in lieu of the judgment pronounced on 18 August, 1995. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) No. QG 72 of 1991 QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and JEAN TOMLINSON Applicants AND: CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED First Respondent AND: ENZO SGAMBELLONE Second Respondent AND: HARRY MALOVANY Third Respondent AND: PETER HOEFLER Fourth Respondent AND: RON HARMER Fifth Respondent AND: CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED Cross Claimant AND: PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and JEAN TOMLINSON Cross Respondents Coram: Drummond J Dates: 29 August, 1995 Place: Brisbane REASONS FOR JUDGMENT An arithmetical error occurred in the calculation of the damages. The parties are agreed that, instead of the judgments pronounced on 12 July, 1995 and 18 August, 1995, there should be judgment against the first respondent for $57,355.50 and judgment against the second respondent for $203,422.50 and judgment against the fourth respondent for $203,422.50. I certify that this and the preceding 1 page are a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Drummond. Associate: Date: 29 August, 1995