Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS - different proceedings in which respective claims for loss overlap - partial settlement of one proceeding - whether settlement agreement and related documents discoverable in other proceedings - claims as to privilege from productions: common interest privilege, privilege of "without prejudice" negotiations - significance on all claims of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) - whether order for production necessary Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 118, 119, 126, 131(1) Federal Court Rules O 15 rr 7A, 8, 11, 15 Supreme Court Rules 1987 (SA) R 58 Manser v Spry & Anor (1994) 124 ALR 539 D'Angola v Rio Pioneer Gravel Co Pty Ltd & Anor (1979) 1 NSWLR 495 Monroe Schneider Associates (Inc) & Anor v No 1 Raberem Pty Ltd & Ors (1991) 104 ALR 397) Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Maurice & Ors (1986) 161 CLR 475 Hong Kong Bank of Australia Ltd v Murphy & Ors [1993] 2 VR 419 Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council & Anor [1989] 1 AC 1280 at 1299 Buttes Gas and Oil Co. & Anor v Hammer & Anor (No.3) [1981] 1 QB 223 at 267 Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risk Association (Bermuda) Ltd unreported on relevant point No. SG 30 of 1995 ROBERT & LORNA ABROOK & ORS v GREG PATTERSON & ORS, WILLIAM JOHN EAST as Administrator of the Family Security Friendly Society & PATRICK FINAN & ORS Branson J Adelaide 30 August 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) ) SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) No. SG 30 of 1995 ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: ROBERT & LORNA ABROOK & ORS Applicants - and - GREG PATERSON & ORS First to Seventh Respondents - and - WILLIAM JOHN EAST as Administrator of the Family Security Friendly Society Eighth Respondent - and - PATRICK FINAN & ORS Cross-Respondents REASONS FOR DECISION CORAM: Branson J PLACE: Adelaide DATE: 30 August 1995 The first to seventh respondents ("Horwaths") by notice of motion dated 18 August 1995 seek orders:- 1. That the applicants produce for inspection by Horwath & Horwath the complete originals of the documents referred to (sic) part 3 of the first schedule to the applicants' updated list of documents dated 8 August 1995.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate