Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS COSTS - appeal dismissed as to costs - whether decision as to costs subject to any consequential orders by reason of orders made on appeal. PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LTD. V. PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. AND WALTER LAU LOKE LIM also known as LAU LOKE LIM and LOW LOKE LIM WAG 158 OF 1993 FRENCH, LEE, COOPER JJ. PERTH 6 OCTOBER 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT) OF AUSTRALIA ) WESTERN AUSTRALIA ) DISTRICT REGISTRY ) GENERAL DIVISION ) NO. WAG 158 OF 1993
ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA B E T W E E N: PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LTD. Appellant and PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. First Respondent and WALTER LAU LOKE LIM also known as LAU LOKE LIM and LOW LOKE LIM Second Respondent
MINUTE OF ORDER THE COURT: FRENCH, LEE, COOPER JJ. DATE OF ORDER: 6 OCTOBER 1995 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. By consent, the sum of $20,000 paid into Court by the appellant as security for the costs of the appeal be paid out of Court:- (a) to the first and second respondents' solicitors in satisfaction of the order for costs of the appeal after those costs have been taxed; and (b) any balance then remaining to the appellant's solicitors.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT) OF AUSTRALIA ) WESTERN AUSTRALIA ) DISTRICT REGISTRY ) GENERAL DIVISION ) NO. WAG 158 OF 1993
ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA B E T W E E N: PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LTD. Appellant and PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. First Respondent and WALTER LAU LOKE LIM also known as LAU LOKE LIM and LOW LOKE LIM Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate