Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No VG 188 of 1993 GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: HUGH ROSS SOMERVILLE Applicant AND: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION, PETER CHAPMAN and AILSA WILSON Respondents CORAM: RYAN J PLACE: MELBOURNE DATE: 20 OCTOBER 1995 MINUTE OF ORDERS THE COURT ORDERS: 1. That the respondents by 5.00pm on 23 October 1995 produce for inspection by the solicitors for the applicant each of the documents numbered 32, 19, 21, 35, 43, 52, 53, 64, 76, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 45, 57, 74, 89, 85, 68, 27, 33, 34, 36, 54, 55, 56 and 26 referred to in the affidavit of Peter Michael Chapman sworn 2 October 1995 excluding from each of the said documents numbered 32, 64, 45, 57, 74 and 85, the passages marked in yellow on the copy thereof initialled for the purpose of identification by Ryan J. 2. That the motion on notice dated 30 August 1994 remitted to a Judge of the Court by the Full Court on 18 September 1995 be otherwise dismissed. 3. That the costs of all parties of the said motion as so remitted be costs in the cause. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in O 36 of the Rules of the Federal Court of Australia.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No VG 190 of 1993 GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: ANZ EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEE COMPANY LTD Applicant AND: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION, PETER CHAPMAN and AILSA WILSON Respondents CORAM: RYAN J PLACE: MELBOURNE DATE: 20 OCTOBER 1995 MINUTE OF ORDERS THE COURT ORDERS: 1. That the respondents by 5.00pm on 23 October 1995 produce for inspection by the solicitors for the applicant each of the documents numbered 32, 19, 21, 35, 43, 52, 53, 64, 76, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 45, 57, 74, 89, 85, 68, 27, 33, 34, 36, 54, 55, 56 and 26 referred to in the affidavit of Peter Michael Chapman sworn 2 October 1995 excluding from each of the said documents numbered 32, 64, 45, 57, 74 and 85, the passages marked in yellow on the copy thereof initialled for the purpose of identification by Ryan J. 2. That the motion on notice dated 30 August 1994 remitted to a Judge of the Court by the Full Court on 18 September 1995 be otherwise dismissed. 3. That the costs of all parties of the said motion as so remitted be costs in the cause. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in O 36 of the Rules of the Federal Court of Australia.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate