Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for stay of sequestration orders pending hearing of appeals against making of the orders - prospects of success - balance of convenience - stay refused - no question of principle. Federal Court Rules, O 52 r 17. COLLEEN MAY HALLS v RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LTD & ANOR No NG 588 of 1995 JUNE SHEILA STREET v RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LTD & ANOR No NG 589 of 1995 STANLEY STREET v RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LTD & ANOR No NG 590 of 1995 FRANCIS TERENCE HALLS v RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LTD & ANOR No NG 591 of 1995 Lindgren J Sydney 5 October 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY) No NG 588 1995 GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: COLLEEN MAY HALLS Appellant AND: RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 384 565) First Respondent THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY Second Respondent
No NG 589 of 1995 BETWEEN: JUNE SHEILA STREET Appellant AND: RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 384 565) First Respondent THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY Second Respondent
No NG 590 of 1995 BETWEEN: STANLEY STREET Appellant AND: RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 384 565) First Respondent THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY Second Respondent
No NG 591 of 1995 BETWEEN: FRANCIS TERENCE HALLS Appellant AND: RETRAVISION (NSW) PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 384 565) First Respondent THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate