The Green Team (W.A.) Pty Ltd (A.C.N. 050 892 423) v Brulee Pty Ltd (A.C.N. 009 066 255) & Ors [1995] FCA 871

CATCHWORDS PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - costs - claim could have been prosecuted in court of lesser jurisdiction - appropriate scale for taxation of costs. THE GREEN TEAM (W.A.) PTY. LTD. (A.C.N. : 050 892 423) V. BRULEE PTY. LTD. (A.C.N. : 009 066 255) AND SHIRLEY MARGARET WHITE AND GEOFFREY THOMAS WHITE WAG198 OF 1992 LEE J. PERTH 1 NOVEMBER 1995

IN THE FEDERAL COURT) OF AUSTRALIA ) WESTERN AUSTRALIA ) DISTRICT REGISTRY ) GENERAL DIVISION ) NO. WAG198 OF 1992 B E T W E E N: THE GREEN TEAM (W.A.) PTY. LTD. (A.C.N. : 050 892 423) Applicant and BRULEE PTY. LTD. (A.C.N. : 009 066 255) Second Respondent and SHIRLEY MARGARET WHITE and GEOFFREY THOMAS WHITE Third Respondents

MINUTE OF ORDER JUDGE MAKING ORDER: LEE J. DATE OF ORDER: 1 NOVEMBER 1995 WHERE MADE: PERTH

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The third respondents pay the applicant's costs to be taxed on the scale appropriate for an action brought in the Local Court of Western Australia. 2. The applicant pay the second respondent's costs to be taxed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT) OF AUSTRALIA ) WESTERN AUSTRALIA ) DISTRICT REGISTRY ) GENERAL DIVISION ) NO. WAG198 OF 1992

B E T W E E N: THE GREEN TEAM (W.A.) PTY. LTD. (A.C.N. : 050 892 423) Applicant and BRULEE PTY. LTD. (A.C.N. : 009 066 255) Second Respondent and SHIRLEY MARGARET WHITE and GEOFFREY THOMAS WHITE Third Respondents