Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT ) VICTORIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No VG 612 of 1995 GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: JOHN FLANAGAN and ANGELA DIANNE FLANAGAN Applicants AND: COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE First Respondent DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Second Respondent COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Third Respondent
No VG 613 of 1995 BETWEEN: ROBERT CHARLES HOWARD Applicant AND: COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE First Respondent DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Second Respondent COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Third Respondent
No VG 747 of 1995 BETWEEN: BRUNO GROLLO Applicant AND: COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE First Respondent DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Second Respondent COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Third Respondent
CORAM: RYAN J PLACE: MELBOURNE DATE: 15 OCTOBER 1995
REASONS FOR RULING ON APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR FURTHER DISCOVERY
THE COURT ORDERS: 1. That the respondents produce for inspection by the applicants paragraph 27 of the document dated 13 June 1993. 2. That costs of the notice of motion dated 24 October 1995 be reserved. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in O 36 of the Rules of the Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT ) VICTORIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No VG 612 of 1995 GENERAL DIVISION )
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate