Federal Court of Australia
C A T C H W O R D S BANKRUPTCY - mortgage within relation back period of bankruptcy - whether title of mortgagee void as against trustee in bankruptcy - whether mortgage given "for valuable consideration" - whether forbearance to sue - avoidance of settlement under s.120 Bankruptcy Act (Cth) discussed. Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - ss.120(1), 120(7) Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic) In Re Carter & Kenderdine's Contract [1897] 1 Ch 776 Wigan v English & Scottish Law Life Assurance Association [1909] 1 Ch 291 Re Hyams (1971) 19 FLR 232 In Re Dundas, Moss v Dundas (1933) 6 ABC 265 Lintner Group Limited v Goldberg (1992) 7 ACSR 580 Re Brall. Ex parte Norton [1893] 2 QB 381 Re Vansittart. Ex parte Brown [1893] 2 QB 377 Re Theodore Charles Trautwein; Richardson v Theo William Nugent Trautwein (1944) 14 ABC 61 Re Macdonald. Ex parte McCullum [1920] 1 KB 205 Re Simms. Ex parte Sheffield [1896] 3 Mans 340 Re Parry. Ex parte Salaman [1904] 1 KB 129 Re Barton; Ex parte Official Receiver v Barton (1983) 52 ALR 95 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Martin (1990) 24 FCR 504 Re Pope. Ex parte Dicksee [1908] 2 KB 169 Bloomfield v Rummage [1897] 23 VLR 365 Re Johnstone; Ex parte Cole (1984) 3 FCR 32 Re Trimbole; Ex parte Donnelly, (unreported, Beaumont J., 11 July 1986) Re Douglas; Ex parte Starkey (1987) 15 FCR 475 Glegg v Bromley [1912] 3 KB 474 Re McCauley. Ex parte Official Receiver (1931) 4 ABC 77 N A Kratzmann Pty Limited (In Liq) v Tucker (1966) 123 CLR 257 THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY v DIMITRIOS RACOVITIS and KATINA RACOVITIS No VG 566 of 1995 Davies, Lockhart & Spender JJ 28 November 1994 Sydney (heard in Melbourne)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE ) No VG 566 of 1995 ) STATE OF VICTORIA ) ) GENERAL DIVISION ) On appeal from a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia BETWEEN: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY Appellant AND: DIMITRIOS RACOVITIS First Respondent KATINA RACOVITIS Second Respondent Coram: Davies, Lockhart & Spender JJ Date: 28 November 1995 Place: Sydney (heard in Melbourne) MINUTES OF ORDER THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate