Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS HEALTH INSURANCE - Review of allegation of breach of undertaking by approved pathology practitioner - Whether review committee entitled to receive legal submissions from counsel representing the Minister - Width of committee's statutory powers to control its procedure and to "inform itself on any matter in such manner as it thinks appropriate". Health Insurance Act 1973, ss.124J and 124N. LYNCH v THE MEDICARE PARTICIPATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, D I CASSIDY QC, DR E RAIK, DR J H MAYNARD and MINISTER FOR HEALTH, HOUSING & COMMUNITY SERVICES NO. NG.323 of 1995 CORAM: WILCOX J PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 12 OCTOBER 1995
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) No. NG.323 of 1995 NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: THOMAS B LYNCH Applicant
AND: THE MEDICARE PARTICIPATION REVIEW COMMITTEE First Respondent D I CASSIDY QC Second Respondent E RAIK Third Respondent J H MAYNARD Fourth Respondent and MINISTER FOR HEALTH, HOUSING & COMMUNITY SERVICES Fifth Respondent
CORAM: WILCOX J PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 12 OCTOBER 1995 MINUTES OF ORDER THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) No. NG.323 of 1995 NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) ) GENERAL DIVISION )
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate