Haynes, Francis Verner & Anor v Top Slice Deli Pty Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 1109

CATCHWORDS COSTS - application successful - cost ordinarily follow the event - applicants found to have contributed to their losses - whether this should be reflected in a costs award - whether successful respondent should get the costs from unsuccessful respondent - whether circumstances warrant either a Bullock order or a Sanderson order Trade Practices Act 1974 Gould v Vaggelas [1985] 157 CLR 215 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association Inc & Ors [1986] ATPR 40-748 Lackersteen v Jones (No 2) [1988] 93 FLR 442 X & Y (by her Tutor X) v Pal & Ors (unreported Mahoney, Clarke, Meagher JJA, New South Wales Court of Appeal, 7 June 1991) Sanderson v Blythe Theatre Company [1903] 2 KB 533 Bullock v London General Omnibus Co [1907] 1 KB 264 FRANCIS VERNER HAYNES & ANOR v TOP SLICE DELI PTY LTD & ORS No. NG 61 of 1994 EINFELD J SYDNEY 22 DECEMBER 1995

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. NG 61 of 1994 GENERAL DIVISION ) Between: FRANCIS VERNER HAYNES & JACQULYN DION HAYNES Applicants And: TOP SLICE DELI PTY LIMITED ACN 008 627 781 First Respondent TOP SLICE DELI SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED ACN 008 636 119 Second Respondent ROSS TRIMBOLI Third Respondent JOHN J DELLAVEDOVA Fourth Respondent GREGORY C A HOLLANDS Fifth Respondent JOHN W BEARD Sixth Respondent FRANCIS VERNER HAYNES & JACQULYN DION HAYNES First Cross Respondents TOP SLICE DELI SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED ACN 008 636 119 First Cross Claimant JOHN J DELLAVEDOVA GREGORY C A HOLLANDS JOHN W BEARD Second Cross Claimants/ Third Cross Respondents TOP SLICE DELI SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED ACN 008 636 119 TOP SLICE DELI PTY LIMITED ACN 008 627 781 ROSS TRIMBOLI Second Cross Respondents/ Third Cross Claimants