Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - refusal of application to join trustees in proceedings before Administrative Appeals Tribunal - reviewing decision of Inspector- General confirming decision of trustees to file notices of objection to discharge from bankruptcy - trial judge held that refusal of joinder not unreasonable, not founded on failure to consider relevant considerations and not involve an error of law - whether refusal of joinder unreasonable - whether refusal founded on failure to consider relevant considerations - whether refusal involved error of law in failure to evaluate relevant factors.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act (Cth) s30(1A), s30(1)(b), s44(2)
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s5, s10(2)
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s11, s12, s51, s149D, s149K, s149P, s149Q Rules of the Federal Court of Australia O 20 r1, O 45 17
No: WG 76 of 1996 BETWEEN:
PETER MICHAEL MELSOM and STANLEY FREDERICK ROBSON Appellants
- and - DEPUTY PRESIDENT B M FORREST First Respondent MARIE SPINELLY and JACQUES SPINELLY Second Respondents
BLACK CJ, LEE and CARR JJ PERTH 17 OCTOBER 1996
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
No. WG 76 of 1996
=_—_S-—TSewTe
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
PETER MICHAEL MELSOM and STANLEY FREDERICK ROBSON
Appellants
DEPUTY PRESIDENT B M FORREST First Respondent MARIE SPINELLY and
JACQUES SPINELLY Second Respondents
CORAM : BLACK CJ, LEE and CARR JJ
PLACE : PERTH DATE : 17 OCTOBER 1996
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The appeal be dismissed, with costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court
Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY No. WG 76 of 1996
GENERAL DIVISION ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: PETER MICHAEL MELSOM and STANLEY FREDERICK ROBSON Appellants - and - DEPUTY PRESIDENT B M FORREST First Respondent MARIE SPINELLY and JACQUES SPINELLY Second Respondents CORAM : BLACK CJ, LEE and CARR JJ PLACE 3 PERTH DATE ; 17 OCTOBER 1996 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT THE COURT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate