Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS Migration - applicant seeking Class 812 (December 1989 (permanent)) entry permit - review of decision of the Immigration Review Tribunal - whether evidence to justify decision that applicant was not a "special need relative" - whether any compassionate ground existed - whether "extreme hardship or irreparable prejudice" - whether emotional feelings of concern and distress that could be experienced by an Australian citizen or permanent resident on the deportation of a relative constitute "prejudice" caused to that person Migration Act 1958, s 476 Migration (1993) Regulations, reg 1.3, Second Schedule, Class 812 entry permit Migration Reform (Transitional Provisions) Regulations, reg 23 Ching Leong Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (unreported), Lindgren J, 16 December 1994 Kobayashi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 51 FCR 24 Fuduche v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 117 ALR 418 Ali v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 38 FCR 144 Marcelo v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 34 ALD 344 Horvath v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 35 ALD 422 Mt Isa Mines Ltd v Pusey (1970) 125 CLR 383 Jaensch v Coffey (1984) 155 CLR 549 Yim v Immigration Review Tribunal (1994) 54 FCR 186 Mendoza v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 31 FCR 405 Matter No. SG22 of 1995 PALWINDER SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS and IMMIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL VON DOUSSA J ADELAIDE 31 JANUARY 1996
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) SOUTH AUSTRALIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY ) ) GENERAL DIVISION ) No. SG22 of 1995 BETWEEN: PALWINDER SINGH Applicant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS and IMMIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL Respondents MINUTES OF ORDER JUDGE MAKING ORDER : VON DOUSSA J. WHERE MADE : ADELAIDE DATE OF ORDER : 31 JANUARY 1996 THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an order of review be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondents' costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate