Re Larkin, Gwendoline Mary Clark v Ex Parte The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1996] FCA 366

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) GENERAL DIVISION ) No VB 2861 of 1992 BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT IN THE STATE ) OF VICTORIA ) BETWEEN: GWENDOLINE MARY CLARK LARKIN (Applicant) AND: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY (As Trustee in Bankruptcy for Gwendoline Larkin) (Respondent) CORAM: Ryan J DATE: 15 May 1996 PLACE: Melbourne MINUTES OF ORDER

THE COURT ORDERS: 1. That the application dated 26 April 1996 be dismissed with costs.

NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) GENERAL DIVISION ) No VB 2861 of 1992 BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT IN THE STATE ) OF VICTORIA ) BETWEEN: GWENDOLINE MARY CLARK LARKIN (A Discharged Bankrupt) EX PARTE:OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY (As Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Gwendoline Mary Clark Larkin) (Applicant) AND: GWENDOLINE MARY CLARK LARKIN (Respondent) CORAM: Ryan J DATE: 15 May 1996 PLACE: Melbourne MINUTES OF ORDER

THE COURT ORDERS: 1. That until further order the respondent be restrained from making any further applications in proceeding numbered VB 2861 of 1992 without leave of the Court.

NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) GENERAL DIVISION ) No VB 2861 of 1992 BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT IN THE STATE ) OF VICTORIA ) BETWEEN: GWENDOLINE MARY CLARK LARKIN (Applicant) AND: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY (As Trustee in Bankruptcy for Gwendoline Larkin) (Respondent) AND:

BETWEEN: GWENDOLINE MARY CLARK LARKIN (A Discharged Bankrupt) EX PARTE:OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY (As Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Gwendoline Mary Clark Larkin) (Applicant) AND: GWENDOLINE MARY CLARK LARKIN (Respondent) CORAM: Ryan J DATE: 15 May 1996 PLACE: Melbourne REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

RYAN J: There is before the Court an application dated 26 April 1996 by Gwendoline Mary Clark Larkin seeking: 1. that the sequestration order of 29 September 1992 be struck out as an abuse of process; and 2. any further orders that are just.