Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to have a subpoena set aside on the grounds that parts of the subpoena are too wide and because it is directed to irrelevant material - substantive application relates to s 205(12) of the Corporations Law - recipient of subpoena is not a party to proceedings and should not be required to make fine judgments as to interpretation of court orders - wording of subpoena too uncertain and excessively wide - request for documents premature as issue not yet joined by parties - general principles discussed. Corporations Law (Cth) - ss 205(12), 205(10)(a) In the Matter of SIGMA SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 004 546 687 BATOKA PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 904 930) v SIGMA SERVICES PTY LIMITED (ACN 004 546 687) No NG3402 of 1996 Tamberlin J Sydney 28 August 1996
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY) No. NG 3402 of 1996 GENERAL DIVISION ) In the Matter of SIGMA SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 004 546 687 BETWEEN: BATOKA PTY LIMITED ACN 002 904 930 Applicant AND: SIGMA SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 004 546 687 Respondent CORAM: TAMBERLIN J PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 28 AUGUST 1996 MINUTE OF ORDERS THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The subpoena be set aside. 2. The applicant pay the costs of Sigma (W.A.) Limited. 3. The applicant file and serve points of claim setting out with detailed particulars the matters and grounds on which it is alleged that the Court ought not to approve the giving of financial assistance, by 10 September 1996. 4. The respondent file and serve detailed points of defence by 20 September 1996. 5. The matter be relisted for further directions on Friday 18 October 1996. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in accordance with Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY) No.NG 3402 of 1996 GENERAL DIVISION ) In the Matter of SIGMA SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 004 546 687 BETWEEN: BATOKA PTY LIMITED ACN 002 904 930 Applicant AND: SIGMA SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 004 546 687 Respondent CORAM: TAMBERLIN J PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 28 AUGUST 1996 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT TAMBERLIN J: The recipient of a subpoena in this proceeding, Sigma (W.A.) Limited ("Sigma WA") has applied to the Court to set aside a subpoena issued by the applicant, Batoka Pty Limited ("Batoka") on the ground that certain parts of the subpoena are too wide and also because the subpoena is directed to material which is irrelevant to any issue between the parties to the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate