Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - appeal from decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("AAT") - whether "fit and proper person" - whether engaged in "relevant employment" - whether AAT equated "good fame, integrity and character" with "fit and proper person" - whether competence and experience considered - whether failure to consider relevant considerations - consideration of evidence by expert tribunals - whether correct onus of proof applied - consideration of concept of legitimate expectation - whether breach of procedural fairness - whether AAT should have commented on the importance of prior registration. Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s251JA, s 251BC(1). Income Tax Regulations, r156. Re Su & the Tax Agents' Board of South Australia (1982) 13 ATR 192 at 195, applied. Davies v Australian Securities Commission (1995) 131 ALR 295, cited. Hughes and Vale Pty Limited v New South Wales (No 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127,cited. Re Schroder & Tax Agents' Board of Victoria (1994) 94 ATC 2144, cited. Re Parker & Tax Agents' Board of New South Wales (1995) 31 ATR 1248, cited. Re Downes & Tax Agents' Board of Queensland (1993) 30 ALD 893, cited. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321, cited. Tax Agents' Board of Queensland v Seymour (1990) 21 ATR 200, distinguished. Spurling v Development Underwriting (Vic) Pty Limited [1973] VR 1, applied. Roads Corporation v Dacakis [1995] 2 VR 508 at 529-30, cited Minister for Health v Thomson (1985) 8 FCR 213, cited THE TAX AGENTS' BOARD OF NEW SOUTH WALES - v - COLIN MARTIN No NG 460 of 1996 Tamberlin J Sydney 26 February 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY) No. NG 460 of 1996 GENERAL DIVISION ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY MR M ALLEN, SENIOR MEMBER BETWEEN: THE TAX AGENTS' BOARD OF NEW SOUTH WALES Applicant AND: COLIN MARTIN Respondent CORAM: TAMBERLIN J PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 26 FEBRUARY 1997 MINUTE OF ORDERS The Court orders that the appeal be dismissed with costs. NOTE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in accordance with Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate