Federal Court of Australia
C A T C H W O R D S BROADCASTING - Anti-siphoning provisions - Declared events - Cricket matches in South Africa - Agreement with commercial television broadcasting licensee for right to televise each match but transmission delayed until 168 hours after completion of the match - Agreement permitted one hour's highlights each day - Whether the licensee had "the right to televise the event". Broadcasting Services Act 1992, s 155, Schedule 2, Part 6, Condition 10(1)(e). No. NG.144 of 1997 FOXTEL CABLE TELEVISION PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 008 797) v NINE NETWORK AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 005 685 407) and AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING AUTHORITY CORAM: WILCOX, LEE and R D NICHOLSON JJ PLACE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN PERTH) DATE: 26 MARCH 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) No. NG.144 of 1997 NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) ) GENERAL DIVISION ) ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FOXTEL CABLE TELEVISION PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 008 797) Appellant
AND: NINE NETWORK AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 005 685 407) First Respondent and AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING AUTHORITY Second Respondent CORAM: WILCOX, LEE and R D NICHOLSON JJ PLACE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN PERTH) DATE: 26 MARCH 1997 MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed 2. The appellant, Foxtel Cable Television Pty Limited, pay to the first respondent, Nine Network Australian Pty Limited, its costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) No. NG.144 of 1997 NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) ) GENERAL DIVISION ) ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FOXTEL CABLE TELEVISION PTY LIMITED (ACN 069 008 797) Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate