Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
BANKRUPTCY - Deed of arrangement - compliance with Part X of Bankruptcy Act 1966 - whether report of Trustee stated whether or not arrangement in best interests of creditors - whether report of Trustee set out all relevant information - whether deed of arrangement complied with debtor's proposal - whether deed of arrangement in reality a composition - whether release contingent upon either an action of the Trustee or a resolution of a subsequent meeting of creditors - whether release repugnant to s 234 - severability - whether debtor omitted material particulars from statement of affairs - exercise of discretion - relevant considerations - relevance of fact that creditors had voted against their commercial interests.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 s 6B(2)(a), s 120 - 125, s 122, s 133 - 139H, s 187, s 188, s 188(2)(c)(ii), s 189A, s 189A(2)(b), s 189A(3) s 190(2)(b), s 204, s 204(2), s 222(1) ‑ (5), s 222(7), s 231(2), s 234, s 234(1), s 236(1)(c), s 237A, s 237(2), s 240, s 249(3), Part X Bankruptcy rules r 78(2)(d)(vi)
In Re Burlock; Burlock v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 49 FCR 522 Gee v Schmutter (1971) 123 CLR 503 Re Marshall; Marshall v Marshall & Luckins (1973) 2 ALR 172 Re Clonan (1963) 20 ABC 245 In re Vizard's Trusts [1866] LR 1 Ch App 588 De Serre v Clarke [1874] LR 18 Eq 587 Sweetapple v Horlock [1879] 11 Ch D 745 Re Morris; Ex parte Adams (1980) 48 FLR 341 Khera v National Australia Bank Ltd (1996) 141 ALR 416 Augustyn v Putnin (1988) 83 ALR 514
No 250A OF 1995X RE: STUART STANLEY McDOUGALL; EX PARTE POLICY NOMINEES PTY LTD AND MARTIN ALAN THOMAS CORAM: GOLDBERG J PLACE: MELBOURNE DATE: 27 MARCH 1997
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT REGISTRY ) OF THE STATE OF VICTORIA ) No 250A of 1995X RE: STUART STANLEY McDOUGALL Debtor EX PARTE: POLICY NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 803 781) (Provisional Liquidator Appointed) and MARTIN ALAN THOMAS Applicants AND: STUART STANLEY McDOUGALL and DAVID ANTHONY BRADSHAW Respondents CORAM: GOLDBERG J PLACE: MELBOURNE DATE: 27 MARCH 1997 MINUTES OF ORDER THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application by the applicants dated 31 July 1996 is dismissed. 2. The applicants pay to the respondents their costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court rules
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate